“It is one thing for the common use of words to shift organically over time…It is another thing, however—and an inherently malevolent thing—to deliberately and dishonestly manipulate and distort meanings so as to manipulate listeners or readers and alter reality.”
—Quin Hillyer
“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command… and if all others accepted the lie, which the party imposed, if all records told the same tale, then the lie passed into history and became truth.”
—George Orwell, 1984
Background
There is a smugly wielded excuse concocted by lunatics who are hellbent on upending reasonable societal norms, common sense, and basic human decency. Their excuse is that these are merely “social constructs,” as if this alone makes them inherently disposable and is justification for their toppling.
What the fools fail to realize is that everything in life is a social construct. Human beings observe and create. They describe their observations and creations. These descriptions are the result of human intelligence at work within the framework of organized societies, the organizing of society itself being a social construct. Social constructs are, in fact, both the result and the foundational building blocks of civilization itself. Absent social constructs, there is no civilization, no society.
Social constructs can certainly change. For much of human history, slavery existed as an institution. Over time—painful millennia of it—mankind discarded the social construct of one human being owning another. The lunatic uses this as evidence in support of his twisted transgender ideology: biology is a social construct, thus, by extension, sex and gender are social constructs which can “change”—you know, just like was done with slavery.
Change must come from a place firmly grounded in reality. No sane person argued that enslaved Blacks were, in fact, free—though some argued they were better off as slaves. No one argued these poor souls should remain slaves, but the name changed to free person—or trans-free—where the declaration of being free made it so. No sane person made the case that if we changed the color of the slave’s skin (or merely declared it so), but kept the person in chains, that the person was somehow free. For or against slavery, people worked off a common definition of slave and slavery. We can put a modern spin on this: At no time was there confusion about who was a male slave and who was a female one. The issue then (as now) is how we treat our fellow human beings, and this requires that we accept the reality of what those human beings are.
Accurate descriptions are an imperative if humans are to function with any semblance of sanity and group cohesiveness. Naming conventions are social constructs we establish, so we can communicate amongst ourselves. The sun rises in what we call the east, sets in what we call the west. The appropriate direction is gazed at if you want to watch a sunrise or sunset. A cat is a cat and a dog is a dog. One fetches a ball, the other looks on with disdain if asked to do so. A person’s opinion on homosexuality doesn’t change the fact that two people of the same sex who are in a romantic relationship (or a merely sexual one) are in a homosexual coupling. Silly word games, such as the ludicrous “trans-lesbian” assertion made by demented male morons, do not change this reality. The so-called trans-lesbian is a man who is in a heterosexual relationship. He is not a lesbian. His female partner is not a lesbian. Similarly, two trans-lesbians in a relationship are actually two men in a homosexual relationship. Any insistence that the rest of us believe otherwise is narcissistic fascism at its most dunderheaded.
Sane people understand this and would think the person mad who insists that we apply the designation of cat to those dogs as he sees fit, and likewise designate some of the cats as dogs. Madder still would be the person who then insists these redesignated cats are, in fact, now real dogs—transdogs, so to speak—capable of having puppies rather than kittens, participating in the Westminster Dog Show, and sniffing for drugs at ports of entry. Maddest of all is the fool who demands the rest of us accept that a male “transdog” can give birth to puppies after having its feline penis and testicles removed, perhaps replaced with a faux-gina. (I fear the day is near when someone insists that his pet is trans, and then a veterinarian Dr. Mengele indulges this lunacy by performing horrific procedures on the hapless animal—other veterinarians will keep quiet out of fear of being called transphobic. Will the SPCA remain silent? PETA? I think you know the answer.)
Further madness awaits us if the lunatic is a transfascist whose contrived self-identity is contingent on infallible validation by others, for then he mandates we agree with him, no matter how insane his assertions, and he intends serious repercussions for anyone who fails to do so. He is a woman because he says he is. He is a real woman because he says he is. He is a biological woman because he says he is. These are assertions made by madmen, madwomen, and madtheys—and there is no shortage of fools and cowards who shall indulge him and punish those who won’t.
This is where we find ourselves today with transgender ideology, which is become transfascism, a maniacal cult based on silly word games and the denial of self-evident truths, both of which asshatteries are ruthlessly enforced. A cult that is indulged to a staggering extent by the cowards in positions of authority at many of our societal institutions. It is their cowardice which has allowed the transfascist madness to have metastasized throughout these institutions and resulted in tremendous harm to children and vulnerable adults, as well as our collective sanity.
The transfascist argues in support of his madness that long-standing conventions regarding language, medical ethics, and basic human decency be discarded because these are merely social constructs, as if these are a timeworn building overdue for an extensive remodel upgrading it to modern tastes. Perhaps the transfascist adds, for good measure, that these original social constructs were imposed on us by White, Christian, patriarchal, capitalistic, heteronormative, cis-male colonizers—as if precolonial people, no matter how primitive their society, did not fully recognize humans are a sexually dimorphic species and were able to readily recognize the males and females amongst them. Transfascists make this flowery, accusatory claim, often using the contrived “two-spirit” example, whereby, the deliberate misinterpretation of a scientifically illiterate society’s beliefs is used as evidence to upend actual science. It is also patronizing as hell—condescension being a component of a transfascist person’s personality disorder (they are Woke, after all). Trust me, sane modern American Injuns understand the concept of a gender binary, man and woman—so did the pre-Columbian ones, despite the claims of today’s transfascists. Do not let scholarly-sounding dunderheads fool you otherwise.
It is not possible to reason with these people. They’re members of the cultiest of cults. The sun rises and sets where the transfascist says it does, a cat can be an actual dog and vice versa, and he intends meaningful—oh so meaningful-consequences—if you dare defy his demands, if you’ve the temerity to assert that a meow is not a bark, if you look to the east for dawn when he jabs his finger insistently toward the west, or if you correctly proclaim that Dylan Mulvaney is a dude now in possession of a perjurious passport. (It is also possible that the transfascist may look to the east for a sunrise but shrilly demand this direction now be referred to as the west—or whatever name the direction identifies itself as. Though the preceding sentence is beyond insane in its implications, it accurately reflects the mindset of these numbskulls. They are quite capable of anthropomorphizing a geographical direction and insisting it’s trans-directional!)
The transfascist believes his definitions of words invalidates yours, his unverifiable “feelings” transmogrify fantasy into concrete reality, his Lysenkoism is real science. He has cowed dictionary publishers, academia, corporations, the medical community, and many others who should damn well know better, into pathetic complicity. A woman is anyone who identifies as a woman—it’s that simple. Ruthlessly so.
A man and a women can be in a lesbian relationship if the man declares he’s a woman. Abracadabra, presto change-o, the guy with a beard and penis is now a dyke. We are scolded that there are female penises, pregnant men, birthing persons, people with prostates or cervixes (why not both?), vagina owners, chestmilk—and, amazingly, there are medical doctors who publicly agree with such asshattery, out of fear or contrivance. We have men in women’s prisons, shelters, restrooms, locker rooms, and other single-sex spaces intended for women only. We have men competing in and winning women’s sporting events—in a particularly insane example from Canada, a middle-aged man who “identifies” as a teenage girl is allowed to not only compete in girls’ swim meets but is granted access to the girls’ locker room at the swim facility. We have male lesbians, imbued with male aggressiveness, barging in on lesbian dating sites. We have actual lesbians kicked off their dating sites and out of their bars because they correctly maintain that a “woman” with a penis is not a lesbian (ditto formerly-penised men). We have children who cannot consent to getting a tattoo or using a tanning bed, but who are allowed to “consent” to undergoing chemical poisoning or medically-assisted mutilation—even if done against the wishes of their parents. (A special thanks to TERF warrior Karen Davis for the brilliantly accurate term “medically-assisted mutilation.”)
The goal of these madmen is social destruction, one social destruct at a time. A controlled demolition of words, common sense, actual science, and human decency, in the furtherance of delusion. Thus, we have the social construct game, one as vicious as any played out before the bloodthirsty crowds in the ancient Roman Coliseum. Anything that upends a common-sense social norm, regardless of the resultant harm, is justified because that norm is a vile social construct. What do the transfascists intend to replace it with? Their own social constructs…the irony utterly lost on their fascist pea brains.
Fine, we’ll play the social construct game.
The two combatants: Good vs. Evil
People suffering from gender dysphoria are not necessarily transfascists. There are gender dysphoric folks who are decent people; they just want to be left alone to live their lives. But transfascism is evil. The adherents and enablers of this ideology—many of whom aren’t gender dysphoric— actively harm children and vulnerable adults. They embrace censorship and they crush heresy. They particularly despise apostates. They are inveterate liars. This is evil behavior.
On the evil side are transfascist transactivists and their enablers. The enablers include virtue-signaling celebrities, ignorant politicians, co-opted or cowardly doctors, and even some moronic physicists. It also includes the cowardly leaders of many institutions, private and public, who fail to realize that to kneel once is to kneel forever—and, boy, have they knelt to transfascist asshattery. On this side is a ship of fools who’ve booked passage on the most intellectually and morally leaky boat that ever launched from any shore.
The true believers fancy themselves edgy and enlightened, iconoclasts of the first order, gleeful pokers in the eyes of outdated and bigoted convention, but they are beholden to a most rigid and unforgiving cult, which brooks not a nanometer of deviation from its tenets. They are doctrinaire iconoclasts for the sake of cachet, destroyers for the sake of destruction, dancers on graves who believe they’ve shown the dead a thing or two. They are dangerous, literally dangerous. They cause grievous irreversible harm—and intend much more. They are the spear point of Woke ideology, and this weapon is aimed at the heart of sanity.
On the good side is everyone else. Decent people with enough sense not to embrace madness. The good side is not a partisan position, despite what the Democratic Party wrongly thinks. They are people of every race, religion, sexuality, political party, socio-economic class, etc. Black and White. Conservatives and liberals. Rich and poor. Gay and straight. Hell, there are gender dysphoric folks on their side.
People on the good side believe what their very eyes see and that there is no reason whatsoever to believe otherwise. They see a man wearing a dress, one who has perhaps had his penis and testicles cut off and is taking a wrong-sex hormone (i.e., estrogen), and who has been issued a perjurious revised birth certificate and driver’s license which falsely designates him as female, and they, nevertheless, see a man for the immutable reason that he is one. The other side indulges this man’s delusion and self-harm, lauds it, and intends punishment for anyone who dissents from gushing over the empress’s new clothes or cooing over his “affirming” government documents.
Decent people’s social construct regarding gender has served humanity well—and they aren’t averse to the word humanity containing the word man. They recognize that in this context it refers to man the species, mankind, a sexually dimorphic mammal comprised of two sexes: men and women, males and females, boys and girls. Most importantly, they understand, either overtly or instinctively, that the coupling of one of each sex among a sufficient percentage of human beings is necessary for the very survival of our species. The Woke are deliberately confused about gender and its role in the continuance of a species. Decent people—and Mother Nature—aren’t.
The Transfascist Social Construct
At this point, a brief overview of transfascist ideology is warranted. Down a very stiff drink first because it’s a doozey.
The transfascist social construct regarding sex and gender is a whirlwind of contradictions and inconsistencies, often dispensed in firehose quantities in either a shrill or smug manner (oftentimes both!). Language is tortured by psychopaths immune to its cries of pain and protest. Sex and gender are social constructs. One is a social construct, the other isn’t. Sex and gender are different. Sex and gender don’t exist. Sex is what’s between your legs and gender is what’s between your ears. Your sex and gender are what you say it is. “There are only two genders” is a transphobic and bigoted statement; it’s hate speech and a hate crime, and those who dare utter it must be pitilessly punished (and have been). The transfascist math is demented: There are no genders, no sexes, or a million of each. But never two—on that point their side is consistently rabid. Shrilly so.
An insistence on cogent definitions enrages the transfascist. A woman is anyone—and the transfascist means ANYONE—who says he (or she) is a woman. That is the only standard for womanhood; in other words, the standard is that there is no standard. Your sex or gender is whatever you say it is—period—and everyone else on Earth is beholden to that assertion. Your gender is fluid and can change throughout your life or throughout a single day—and the rest of us are to accept this and unfailingly affirm it in a manner as decreed by the gender-confused person (or else suffer meaningful consequences). There is no standard, except for a person’s self-declaration, and to challenge said claim is transphobic bigotry of the highest order, a sin worthy of personal destruction and outright criminalization. It’s a silliest parody of 1984, except that it comes with concomitant brutality that might make Big Brother cringe at its audacity.
When asked to define what a woman is, the transfascist and his enablers are left in either indignant rage or cowardly paralysis. It is painfully obvious on the faces of the cowards that they know full-well what a woman is, but self-preservation from the wrath of the transfascists stills their tongues into pitiful collaboration. For they know that to accurately define woman is to the transfascists a mortal sin, akin to murder or rape. In fact, it is genocide, a word rendered über-hyperbolic by transfascists who toss it about with childish insouciance. Misgendering (known as accurate-gendering to sane people) is violence (yes, they’ve said this) and genocide, a veritable Auschwitz—apparently a death camp where the trans-identifying males are hellbent on accessing the women’s showers.
Genocide? Really? A rational person sees that the transfascists are a politically powerful group, which wields hugely disproportionate influence on society’s institutions. They “punch above their weight-class” (another bon mot from Karen Davis). For example, there are biologists, doctors, politicians, and many others who insist that Dylan Mulvaney is a real woman. During a meeting with Mr. Mulvaney, President Joe Biden stated it is “sinful” to deny the gender-confused access to their so-called “gender-affirming care.” So how can the transfascists be subjected to genocide at the same time? Answer: They are not.
To a rational person, believing oneself as “born in the wrong body”—especially if it results in medical mutilation or the taking of powerful wrong-sex hormones—is an obvious mental illness. This is commonly referred to as gender dysphoria. But to the transfascists, there can be no “diagnosis” of gender dysphoria because that implies it’s an affliction of some sort. “That would be like saying someone’s race is an illness!” And (once again) the result is that any sort of standard is bigoted: A woman is anyone who identifies as a woman. Period. End of discussion. What are you, a bigoted perpetrator of genocide?!
The absence of an accurate nonpartisan diagnosis, and the assertion that gender dysphoria is not a mental health affliction, does not mean that billions upon billions of dollars of healthcare resources are to be denied these cultists. No siree. The transfascist screams that to deny a person these resources is to literally deny that person “suicide-prevention” care. The person is not mentally ill, yet there is an indisputable risk of that person committing suicide unless we quickly, and without any safeguarding whatsoever, offer up the drugs and scalpels.
Enough of that. My head hurts. You get the picture: The transfascists are demented asshats.
Sane People’s Social Construct
I’ll summarize the social construct that keeps us out of madness and from plunging into the abyss of transfascist asshattery. It accepts biological reality and recognizes the importance of honesty. It is a social construct based on the previously uncontroversial positions of “Do no harm” and “Children cannot consent to life-changing decisions.” These are morally correct positions that the transfascist perversely considers akin to, well, genocide. [Sigh.]
1.Transfascism is based on the unverifiable: We cannot read another person’s mind—nor should we want to. Sometimes it’s difficult to read our own. A person’s “belief” that he or she is “in reality” the opposite sex is unverifiable. A society can only—and should only—deal with the physical manifestations of our thoughts and feelings (e.g., the person’s behavior or actions).
2. Sex and gender are the same: Sex and gender are synonyms and are used by sane people interchangeably and without unnecessary confusion or contentiousness. It allows clear and truthful communication in medical, legal, and social settings. If asked on a form to choose male or female for one’s sex or gender (the form only need ask for one, since sane people know what is meant by the question), a person can answer without pause—and give the same answer for either case. “Prefer not to answer” is an honest third choice on a form where one’s gender is not critical information—some forms are indeed overly nosey.
3. Humans are a sexually dimorphic species: Humans are mammals. Mammals are sexually dimorphic: male and female. There are no additional sexes (or genders).
4. Non-binary does not exist: There is no such thing as a non-binary person. There are very rare medical conditions that transactivists incorrectly claim justify the concept of a non-binary person, but those publicly claiming this “identity” are almost certainly not suffering from any of these conditions. It is affliction appropriation used in furtherance of toxic narcissism. Furthermore, these medical conditions occur in relation to the sexual binary, and are not an additional gender. Human beings have ten fingers and ten toes. A medical condition (e.g., polydactyly) or accident that leaves a person with a different number of fingers or toes does not negate the fact that the person is still a human being; likewise, cutting off a man’s penis doesn’t negate the fact that he remains a man, albeit a castrated one.
Perhaps a better analogy is the person who claims he was wrongly assigned ten fingers at birth, and has several of these surgically removed by an evil doctor, so he can then be “affirmed” as what he “identifies” as, namely a person with eight fingers. He and his enablers insist that a failure to remove these fingers would result in the person’s suicide. “Would you rather have a live son with eight fingers or a dead son with ten?” Counseling done to get the person to accept his ten fingers is, of course, bigoted conversion therapy and should be outlawed. Yet surgery isn’t necessary: a person who identifies as someone with eight fingers might keep all ten but insist like hell that you only see eight and infallibly affirm this notion over and over. That his hands would fit awkwardly into four-fingered gloves is something cowards ignore: “If you say it don’t fit, then you’re a bigot.”
(The above analogy is not farfetched. There are people who “identify as disabled” and who have harmed themselves in furtherance of this delusion.)
5. Honesty is a virtue: There are important reasons for honesty regarding one’s gender; for example, identification purposes, medical care, fairness (e.g., sports), and women’s safety. Honesty for its own sake is also an important reason.
6. Perjury is wrong: Documents that incorrectly state a person’s sex are perjurious. This includes birth certificates, driver’s licenses, and passports.
7. Gender fluidity does not exist: There is no ambiguity (or fluidity) regarding gender. Humans throughout history have been able to readily discern another person’s gender (male or female) with a high degree of accuracy, very rare medical conditions or skillful cosplay notwithstanding. You can change how you present yourself to the world or behave, but that involves the outward expression of your personality, not your gender.
8. Gender spectrum does not exist: There is no such thing as a gender spectrum. What is commonly referred to as such is merely each of our different personalities and how we express or otherwise conduct ourselves. Gender identity, gender expression, and gender non-conforming are just terms for one’s unique personality gussied up to give it smug prestige. The same is true for those transfascists who claim that sex and gender are different: Gender in this case refers to the person’s personality, not a change in his or her biological reality.
9. Pronouns: The pronoun game (a future blog post by itself) is ground zero for transfascist madness. It is used to control others and confirm membership in the transfascist cult. It also is a means of identifying troublemakers (i.e., those who refuse to play the pronoun game, either by not stating theirs or by insisting on using correct pronouns despite the other person’s declaration or demand).
- The speaker decides: The pronouns used in reference to someone are determined by the speaker, not decreed by the person referred to, and should accurately reflect the person’s sex if truthfulness and clear communication are desired. For example, I refer to Dylan Mulvaney with he/him/his pronouns. He wants this made illegal. He is a transfascist.
- They is not a gender: “They” is used for plural situations or as a placeholder when the referred-to person’s gender is not known. “They” is not meant to refer to a single person whose gender is known. (Sam Smith and Ezra Miller are men. Bella Ramsey is a woman. None of them is a “they.”)
- Deadnaming is not a crime: Related to the pronoun madness is the concept of using a person’s “pre-trans” name instead of his or her new name. For example, referring to the actress Elliot Page as Ellen Page is considered deadnaming her. You can’t change your sex, but you can change your name. That having been said, using a person’s “deadname” may be impolite in certain situations, but it is not a crime, nor should it be. A famous person who changes his or her name, has no right to expect utter conformance in usage of the new moniker. Such an expectation, akin to people on social media demanding no negative comments or push-back on their postings, is petulant childishness. Enforcement of it is fascism.
- Compelled speech is fascism: Insisting you be referred to with incorrect pronouns—or worse, made-up ones—is the epitome of narcissistic imbecility and is fascist behavior.
- The truth is not the same as bad manners: It is not impolite to use correct pronouns when the referred-to person insists otherwise. Nor is it impolite to correctly state that a transwoman is a man or that a transman is a woman. In these cases, the referred-to person is the one being impolite because he or she is requiring that another person actively participate in their mental illness, fetish, or contrivance.
- Pronoun declarations and inquiries are imbecilic: Asking another person for “their pronouns” or publicly stating yours is falsely presented as a sign of politeness and solidarity with a “marginalized” group of people. It is neither of these. If that were true, the worse consequence for noncompliance would be that the dissenter is considered a rude jerk. Instead, failure to comply can result in serious consequences, including personal destruction and legal penalties. The sharing of one’s pronouns or asking another person for his or hers is the “Heil Hitler” of the Woke. It is meant to confirm one’s fealty to a cult, either as a true believer or as a cowardly or mindless capitulator, and to identify those who dare resist. Also consider this: The pronoun game is the “gateway drug” to the madness of gender ideology.
- Do not mandate pronoun declarations: It must be illegal for an employer or school to mandate that a person declare his or her “pronouns” orally or on official documents, or as part of a bio (e.g., at the end of an email). Entities that currently mandate this are evildoers, mindless facilitators of transfascism, or cowards.
- Media complicity is unethical journalism: The media, if it is to retain credibility, must stop using inaccurate pronouns because they are terrified of being called “transphobic.” Accommodating this leads to confusing articles, particularly the they/them nonsense. Referring to Dylan Mulvaney with she/her pronouns is journalistic malpractice.
- Misgendering is accurate gendering: There is no such thing as misgendering, as meant by transfascists. What is meant by this term is, in reality, accurate-gendering. Actual misgendering would be to refer to Dylan Mulvaney using the she/her pronouns. He is a man and always shall be a man.
10. Definition of male and female: The definition of male and female is not complicated. A female is a person whose cells contain what is commonly referred to as the XX chromosome pair. Absent age or medical condition, a female can produce large nonmotile gametes called ova. A male is a person whose cells contain what is commonly referred to as the XY chromosome pair. Absent age or medical condition, a male can produce smaller motile gametes called sperm. Age or medical conditions do not negate the reality of our sexual dimorphism.
11. Definition of man and woman: A woman is an adult human female. A man is an adult human male.
12. Dylan Mulvaney is a male: A trans-identifying male (aka transwoman) is a male. A trans-identifying female (aka transman) is a female. These facts are not impolite or hateful or transphobic.
13. You cannot change your sex/gender: There is no such thing as gender-affirming care or a sex-change operation. There is no “transition” or “finding one’s true self” in relation to biology. These are odious euphemisms for mutilation and poisoning. There is nothing to “affirm.” A person cannot change his or her sex. A castrated man is still a man. A man taking doses of wrong-sex hormones (i.e., estrogen) is still a man. A woman who has her breasts and reproductive organs removed is still a woman. A woman taking doses of wrong-sex hormones (i.e., testosterone) is still a woman.
14. Gender-affirming care is immoral: Regardless of the legality, regardless of any claims by so-called experts or the result of any studies, it is medically unethical to remove or otherwise mutilate healthy body parts, chemically sterilize a minor, or provide anyone with medically unnecessary medications. It is medical malpractice. It is a colossal waste of medical resources. It is evil.
15. Gender dysphoria is a mental health affliction: Gender dysphoria is a serious mental health affliction, especially when the sufferer wishes to self-harm (i.e., medicalization). Accepting this fact allows us to provide the person proper counseling that is both caring and ethical. Reasonable accommodations may be considered for those who cannot be cured of this affliction (e.g., perhaps a certain degree of social transitioning in some settings).
16. Gender dysphoria is not “just like being gay”: In this context, I’ll use “gay” to refer to both male and female homosexuals. Transfascists glommed themselves onto the cause of gay rights, claiming their issues are comparable. Many gay people are not happy with their cause being associated with that of the transfascists. When gay people fought for the right to marry or otherwise be left alone to live their lives like the rest of us, they did not clamor for everyone to accept that two men in a homosexual relationship were somehow in a heterosexual one. They did not demand the right to physically harm members of “their community.” They did not want to outlaw counseling efforts aimed at preventing a gay person from self-harm or helping a person accept his or her homosexuality. They did not argue that age-inappropriate materials be placed in their children’s classrooms. They did not argue that the English language be tortured into compliance with silly word games. Their goal was to let people “love who they love,” something the so-called trans-lesbians are hellbent against, as evident by their relentless insistence that actual lesbians must date and have sex with them, lest they be deemed transphobes.
17. A threat of suicide is a serious problem, not an excuse for medically-assisted self-harm: The threat “Would you rather have a live daughter or a dead son?” used to cow vulnerable parents and others into conformity with the transfascist agenda is despicable. It wouldn’t be a live daughter. It would be a son who has been victimized by the medical-industrial complex and transactivists. The threat of suicide should not result in society indulging the person’s delusion or desire for medically-facilitated self-harm. Such a threat is further evidence of the seriousness of the person’s mental illness. In this situation, I’d rather a son get ethical non-activist therapy in order to identify the source of his problems and help him accept what he is (a male)—which in some states is actually illegal—rather than allow him to commit self-harm facilitated by demented teachers, therapists, and doctors. Chemical poisoning with sterilizing agents (puberty blockers) and wrong-sex hormones and surgical mutilation are not suicide prevention care. Bottom line: Try harder with the counseling.
18. Stereotypes should not be weaponized: Just because a person does not conform to male or female stereotypes, does not mean the person is “in the wrong body.” For example, a butch lesbian is not a man.
19. Leave tomboys and femboys alone: Tomboys are not boys. Effeminate boys are not girls. Not adhering to traditional stereotypes regarding gender does not make a person the opposite sex
20. Homosexuals should not be victimized by transfascist ideology: A gay person is not a heterosexual born in the wrong body or “assigned” the wrong gender at birth. “Transing away the gay” is the ultimate conversion therapy.
21. Autistic people should not be victimized by transfascist ideology: Gender-confused people often have mental health co-morbidities (e.g., autism). Transing away autism or these other co-morbidities is despicable.
22. Male lesbians don’t exist: There is no such thing as a male lesbian.
23. Leave the lesbians alone: Lesbians are not attracted romantically or sexually to penised or formerly-penised individuals (i.e., men). That’s literally the definition of lesbian, and they do not owe trans-identifying males access to lesbian dating sites, lesbian bars, or their pants.
24. A person’s sexuality is not transphobic: “Genital preferences” is another term for one’s sexuality. Such preferences are not transphobic or otherwise bigoted (as is claimed by transfascists). To claim that genital preferences (i.e., one’s sexuality) is somehow bigoted or transphobic is coercion that is creepy and “rapey.”
25. Trans-genocide is a myth: There is no trans-genocide. In fact, transactivists wield immense power over Western institutions, vastly disproportionate to their small numbers. Ironically, they are the ones committing genocide against themselves via medical procedures that result in sterility. Bottom line: A crime committed against a trans-identifying or otherwise quirky person should be treated with the same seriousness as a crime committed against anyone else.
26. Born in the wrong body is a myth: No one is born in the wrong body. A person who believes he or she was “born in the wrong body” should be afforded quality non-activist therapy to find out what co-morbidities or other issues may be causing this gender dysphoria. The primary goal should be to help the person accept what they are, not indulge the delusion that they are, or can be made into, the opposite sex. Fast-tracking the person to unnecessary medical procedures is evil.
27. Assigned at birth is a myth: No one is assigned male or female at birth. Your sex is observed and recorded. It is what it is.
28. “Affirming-care” is the actual conversion therapy: Getting someone to accept his or her sex is not conversion therapy. The actual conversion therapy is chemical sterilizing agents, wrong-sex hormones, castration, cutting off healthy breasts, and other gruesome procedures.
29. Age-inappropriate materials do not belong in schools: Good parents do not want age-inappropriate materials in their children’s schools. This is not book-banning, as these materials are available when the child reaches the appropriate age. Ironically, the Woke parents who squawk about this are the actual book banners because they don’t want books they don’t like published or sold to anyone, including adults.
30. Rape by deception is rape: Deliberately hiding one’s gender as means to have sex with someone is rape by deception.
31. Puberty is not a disease: Puberty is not a disease. Blocking it deprives a person of a critical step in life. We may not be satisfied with the outcome, but we must accept it and make the best of it.
32. Language matters: Transfascists language machinations make Orwell’s 1984 look quaint by comparison:
- Puberty blockers are chemical sterilizing agents.
- Cross-sex hormones are wrong-sex hormones.
- Phalloplasty, metoidioplasty, and vaginoplasty are genital mutilation.
- Gender-affirming surgery (aka bottom surgery) is genital mutilation.
- Top-surgery (mastectomy) is mutilation of a secondary sex characteristic.
33. Women’s spaces must be kept women-only: The “Normandy landing at Omaha Beach” of transfascism is the demand that trans-identifying males be allowed to enter and use spaces that are meant exclusively for use by women. This includes women’s restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, domestic violence shelters, jails, and sporting events. Men, regardless of their gender identity claims, must be kept out of these spaces. Good men stay the hell out of these spaces. Good men also keep other men out of them.
Dealing with Transfascism and Gender Dysphoria
Within the context of these sane social constructs, we must ultimately ask ourselves two important questions: (1) What does society do with gender dysphoric people who believe (or claim) they are “born in the wrong body” or “identify as the opposite sex” and (2) What does a society do with those who cannot desist from their delusion despite good therapy?
In other words, how far does the government go in its intervention regarding this matter? What do we tolerate or prohibit? How do we treat fellow human beings who are gender dysphoric or claim to be? Equally important, and never discussed, is what we must expect of them in regards to how they treat those of us who are not supporters of transgender ideology or the transfascist social constructs.
We can’t read minds, so in planning for the worst-case scenario, we should assume there are indeed people who are uncomfortable with their gender to the point that it affects their lives in negative ways. Some of these people may want to do actual physical or chemical modifications to their bodies—sane people rightly consider this self-harm. Some gender dysphoric people may only want to socially transition, which means adopt superficial manners or appearance related to the opposite sex (often stereotypical affectations involving dress, hairstyle, or cosmetics).
Acknowledging this worst-case scenario doesn’t necessarily mean we allow or otherwise indulge their actions, but we should recognize that this condition may persist in some individuals. The desire to go beyond social transitioning is clearly self-harm, regardless of the person’s age, and a good therapist should treat it as a serious mental illness rather than affirming the person’s delusion.
No one is possessed of perfect mental health. We are all burdened with some degree of damage. We should also consider that there are gender dysphoric people able to function reasonably well. They work, go to school, and respect other people’s opinions. They are not transfascists. There are gender dysphoric people whose condition, including any comorbidities, is so debilitating that they cannot function in a constructive or meaningful way. These people require significant mental health resources—not drugs or surgeries. Then there are members of the transfascist cult whose behavior is harmful to society—they may or may not be gender dysphoric. Compassion for non-transfascists is usually warranted. The transfascists and their enablers are evil and must be stopped.
With this in mind, here are some suggestions:
1. Do not vote for transfascists or their enablers: Do not vote for politicians who support the transfascist agenda. Among its odious tenets, this agenda includes prohibitions against proper diagnosis and therapy; a hellbentedness regarding the medicalization of minors, even over the objection of parents; criminalizing or otherwise punishing dissent from the pronouns game; and the inclusion of clearly age-inappropriate materials in schools. This may mean voting for someone with whom you disagree on other issues, but stopping transfascism is that important.
2. Revere freedom of speech: Censorship is always done on behalf of evil. Always. Freedom of speech is the best weapon against, not just transfascism, but all forms of fascism. The weirdo on TikTok gets to espouse her bizarre pronouns. The rest of us must—absolutely must—not be compelled to use them. Accept that the speaker decides the pronouns used when referring to someone else. Do not ask for “someone’s pronouns” or provide yours. Stopping the pronoun game would, by itself, go a long way to restoring sanity in the world. Insist on accurate language: The use of the term trans-identifying male is preferred to the term transwoman, as it makes clear that the gender dysphoric person is a male. Likewise, the term trans-identifying female instead of transman.
3. Defend the reality of sexual dimorphism: In order to debate an issue, all sides must have a common starting point. The transfascist is not in a position to rationally debate how we should deal with a man who believes he is a woman. The transfascist insistence that this person is a biological woman precludes any meaningful discussion. This is akin to trying to engage someone in a debate as to whether we should build a new aircraft carrier, when this person insists the ship is actually a hippopotamus.
To deal properly and ethically with gender dysphoric people, we must be firmly grounded in the reality that there are only two genders: male and female. Any deviation from this immutable truth is folly. Ignore retarded biologists, healthcare providers, and other so-called enlightened folks, who’ve demeaned themselves, either through cowardice or contrivance, and became transmaidens for transfascism. They are gender Flatearthers who should be allowed to espouse their nonsense (in the interest of free speech), but we are not obligated to implement their lunacy as public policy, and, in fact, must fight like hell against such implementation.
4. Accept that quirky people exist, but they have no inherent right to upend society: The world is full of quirky people who look or behave atypically. This includes the gender-confused who claim to identify as the opposite sex (or some made-up gender concoction). We can’t read a person’s mind in order to prove the veracity of his claim regarding self-identity. Sometimes these claims are a deliberate attempt to draw attention, in which case it is childishly unreasonable to expect this attention to be unfailingly positive.
In the best interest of everyone’s freedom, including the quirky person’s, it’s okay to think these people are weird and say so. But quirky people who can function reasonably well in society should not be denied the same rights as others. This does not mean a man gets to use a women’s locker room, as that would deny women their right to privacy in intimate spaces. This not mean they get to dictate our speech or force others to participate in their delusion, as that violates the basic human right to free speech. This not mean that society allow “gender-affirming care,” as that would mean actively supporting an evil medical practice akin to human sacrifice.
5. Provide unisex, single-person restrooms in public facilities: This is long overdue in many public places. There are reasons why a person might feel safer or more comfortable using a single-person restroom. In junior high and high school, restrooms and locker rooms are like Thunderdome: weaker or quirkier kids are bullied. Single-person restrooms are a viable solution. Keep in mind that transfascists and their enablers oppose this and will make outrageous claims (“It’s like separate drinking fountains for Whites and Coloreds during the Jim Crow Era!”). A Holy Grail for transfascists is allowing men to use women’s restrooms and other women’s spaces (gender-confused females are not clamoring to use the men’s restroom, as far as I’m aware). The delight it gives them in poking decent convention in the eye is a form of trans-orgasm.
6. Provide real therapy: There’s a world of difference between properly treating someone with gender dysphoria versus ruthlessly insisting they are actually the opposite sex or some made-up one and then facilitating this madness via medicalization and censorship. Which is where we find ourselves today. Laws banning caring therapy for the gender-confused people must be overturned. A person who wants self-harming procedures is mentally ill. People should receive quality, non-activist care to get to the root of the problem and to help them accept what they are. This is true caring and compassion.
7. Social transitioning: The question regarding those who only socially transition, which is to say dress or act stereotypically in the manner of the opposite sex, is whether state intervention is warranted. If the person can function reasonably well in society, I suggest leaving them alone to the largest degree possible. Conversely, this person has certain responsibilities. For example, other people may think it’s weird and should be allowed to say so. That right must be revered if we are to fight fascism. Everyone, including the person who has socially transitioned, must revere freedom of speech—or we are doomed.
8. Ban medical transitioning: Medically transitioning must be illegal for minors. Period. What about adults? Do we sacrifice them if that is the only way to protect kids? Yes, though it should also be illegal for adults. At the very least, it must be considered an abhorrent medical practice, and let the providers suffer the legal consequences. Bottom line: Medical transitioning is unethical for anyone of any age. Ignore the gaslighting regarding suicide and there being no regret among people who’ve undergone these procedures. This is irrelevant. It’s profoundly immoral to mutilate and poison someone, even if the person is an adult who consents to it.
9. Revere the concept of “age of consent”: Children cannot consent to puberty blockers, wrong-sex hormones, or mutilation surgeries. Period. That we currently do not protect all children from these procedures everywhere evokes another question: Is our society worth saving if this practice continues, anywhere, particularly on children? The answer is no, we are not worth saving.
10. Other Reasonable accommodations: A driver’s license or other form of I.D. should accurately reflect the person’s actual sex. For those who present atypically, a note could be included to help prevent confusion. For example, Dylan Mulvaney’s I.D. must state he’s a male, but there could be some additional detail included for clarification purposes.
Final Thoughts
Gender-confused people shouldn’t be mistreated solely based on their quirkiness. But…it is not mistreatment to accept biological reality that there are two genders, and a person can’t change his or hers. It is not mistreatment to keep gender-confused men out of women’s spaces and sports. It is not mistreatment to stop the insane medicalization of the gender-confused, both children and adults. It is not mistreatment to provide therapy intended to help the person accept his or her actual gender. It is not mistreatment to revere the basic human right to free speech, which includes “offensive” speech. It is not mistreatment to refuse to play the pronoun game. It is not mistreatment to require that official documents accurately state a person’s sex. It is not mistreatment to prevent schools from hiding the “transing” of children from their parents. It is not mistreatment to keep sexually explicit materials out of K-12 schools.
It is the decent side who are kind and empathetic. In our social construct, if a person tells us he wants to mutilate primary or secondary sex characteristics or take powerful wrong-sex hormones or chemical sterilizing agents, our social construct tells us this is a person with serious mental health issues who needs help. That is true compassion.
The transfascist side is evil. They consider our genuine caring to be bigoted “conversion therapy” because it denies them what is essentially a human sacrifice to their god. Look at the faces of the Woke, the transfascists. They are your mutilators and harmers. They are your future camp guards and inquisitors. They are evil.
Be First to Comment