“Science is free to promote humanity’s liberation from superstition or even God, but not from humanity itself.”
Douglas Rushkoff
The trans-cult, as is true with many of today’s cults (e.g., global warming hystericalists), asserts that science is on their side. Indeed, they can reference scholarly-sounding studies in support of their odious ideology. This is not surprising because every institution is captured by these lunatics, including science and academia. Cults are big on censorship. The trans-cult strives to crush any research that might contradict their insanity. Despite this, there are courageous researchers who put forth evidence which debunks the madness of the trans-cult.
Research that challenges the trans-cult narrative is useful, but the bottom line is that, ultimately, it’s irrelevant. The trans-cult embraces studies that support their ideology; someone else with enough temerity debunks it; therefore, we are left with an endless cycle of dueling research for an issue of black and white morality that transcends the need for study.
There are other issues of these nature. It doesn’t matter what a scientist says, including moronic physicists like Neil deGrasse Tyson, what a doctor says, what a politician says. If a study somehow proved that slavery is a great idea and should be reinstituted into society, it would still be an immoral practice. If a study showed human sacrifice is beneficial for agricultural production or control of the weather, it would still be immoral. Likewise, it is immoral to actively indulge a person’s harmful delusion; it is immoral to physically harm another human being, of any age, with unnecessary drugs or mutilating surgeries; it is immoral not to help a gender-confused person accept his or her actual gender rather than make them a human sacrifice for the trans-cult and an annuity for the healthcare-industrial complex.
Science has its role in our lives. Science without morality does not.
Be First to Comment