“It is necessary that I should know the truth that I may chastise you for the evil you have done or avenge you for the wrongs you have endured.”
—Miguel de Cervantes, Don Quixote
As reported by Genevieve Gluck of Reduxx, Steven Buchanan murdered two men and fed their bodies to pigs at his farm in Oregon. He may have killed others. Guess where he is serving his prison sentence…wait for it…a women’s prison!
Why? Because he says he’s a woman. Prison records officially list his sex as female. In Oregon, and other real-world dystopias, merely declaring oneself a woman makes it true, and the rest of the world is expected, sometimes under penalty of law for noncompliance, to unquestioningly accommodate the assertion, no matter how ludicrous the obeisance.
You may wonder if the thought (or calculated contrivance) within this murderous monster’s head magically transformed his Y chromosome into a second X chromosome. Pshaw: It doesn’t matter if it did or didn’t. A person’s proclaimed “gender identity” is what transforms Mr. Buchanan into a real woman, with all its privileges; any transmogrification of DNA is unnecessary and irrelevant. His delusion or contrivance is, by extension, now everyone else’s reality, as well.
You may also wonder if the people who facilitated this macabre travesty, either directly or by electing or appointing morons to positions of authority, are bereft of sanity. They are indeed—or they’re, at the very least, cowards who enable it by their silence and timid acquiescence. Those who remain silent about something this abhorrent are co-conspirators and are as guilty as the true believers.
The advocates for this madness fancy themselves enlightened and compassionate and are willing to be smug asshats to prove it. “We’ll show you, bigots!” is their battle cry, a term I bring up often in my blog posts. They are no different than savages who sacrificed virgins to prove their devotion to a cruel god; in this case, the sacrifice are the female inmates—and truth itself—whose safety and dignity are of no concern when compared to the proof of one’s faux-compassion and benighted enlightenment.
How did society come to allow a male to declare himself female with the expectation that everyone else actively participate in the charade? The transgender ideologues (aka transfascists) possess incredible power, which is particularly ironic because they claim to be the world’s most marginalized and oppressed group, one subjected to a veritable genocide. Yet everyone involved in this murder case is terrified to risk offending the transfascists—or Mr. Buchanan. Therefore, a male killer in Oregon is currently incarcerated in a women’s prison. Official documents identify him as female. Except for at least one intrepid reporter (Ms. Gluck), the cowardly media and law enforcement refer to him with feminine pronouns. (Outlets such as Reduxx are to be commended for refusing to use incorrect female pronouns—or the imbecilic they/them—when referring to biological males. You go, actual girls!)
Those of us who aren’t fools rightfully consider it madness to put a male in a women’s prison. Unfortunately for us, and for the female inmates, the transfascists—and their enablers—would look upon our challenging Mr. Buchanan’s absurd notion that he is a woman as a far greater crime than the murders he committed. Yes, they’re that demented, and in über-Orwellian fashion, they want to criminalize our audacity, rain personal destruction upon any of us who dissent from this foolishness.
This insanity must stop. It’s a nonpartisan issue of concern to all decent people. We must insist those placed in positions of leadership at our societal institutions (e.g., criminal justice system) are not cowards or morons. Allowing gender-confused (or gender-contrived) individuals to live in relative peace, as long as they are law-abiding adults, does not mean society must actively participate in, or otherwise affirm, their confusion or contrivance, and it certainly does not mean we bastardize reality, dispense with common sense, or disregard accurate language. It most certainly does not mean we put women at risk in order to accommodate trans-identifying monsters.
Facts matter. Facts are not “hate speech” or “transphobia” or “violence.” This vile murderer is a man. He is a monster. Official documents must refer to him as a male. The media should stop the nonsense of using incorrect pronouns or nouns (e.g., using she/her/female/woman in in reference to Mr. Buchanan or Dylan Mulvaney). Males must not be incarcerated in women’s prisons. As is true with any prisoner, at a men’s or women’s facility, if he or she is at risk of harm from other inmates, provisions for protective custody must be made. Putting him in a women’s prison because fools want to believe he is actually a woman—or are terrified of offending those who do—is utter lunacy. Evil lunacy.
Tragically, nobody in a position of authority in Oregon had the balls to say “Enough! He’s not a woman. We can’t put this fiend in a women’s prison.” I’d ask why the women’s rights groups aren’t outraged about this situation and speaking up accordingly; but au contraire, NOW has declared that transwomen are real women, so I’m guessing they’re cool with this odious arrangement. This further belies the claim that gender-confused people are a marginalized group. It is, in fact, transfascism über Alles.
A final note: I’m not aware that trans-identifying women (biological women who claim to be transmen) are clamoring to be incarcerated in men’s prisons. Gee, I wonder why…
Reduxx article: https://reduxx.info/us-trans-identified-male-killer-who-fed-victims-to-pigs-serving-life-sentence-in-womens-prison/
Be First to Comment